ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPAGATION and DIELECTRIC LOGS

Electromagnetic PROPAGATION
LOG BASICS
Dielectric (DPT) logs and electromagnetic propagation (EPT) logs
are logs of the high-frequency dielectric properties of reservoir
rocks. Dielectric propagation logs work between 20 and 200
MHz. Logs made above 200 MHz and into the GHz range are known as
electromagnetic propagation logs.
The
dielectric log usually includes two curves: the relative dielectric
permittivity, epsilon, which is unitless,
and the resistivity in ohm-m. At the frequency used, water molecules
have a strong effect on the dielectric properties, so that both
relative dielectric permittivity and conductivity increase with the
volume of water present. Relative dielectric permittivity can be
used to distinguish hydrocarbons from water of any salinity.
However, the effect of salinity is more important than the salinity
effect with the higher frequency electromagnetic propagation log,
and the interpretation is more complex. The advantage of the
dielectric propagation log is that the lower frequency permits a
larger depth of investigation and therefore an analysis of the
undisturbed zone.
Electromagnetic propagation logs record propagation time and
attenuation in a shallow region Propagation time can be
transformed into water filled porosity and attenuation is used as a
shale indicator. Water filled porosity, along with effective
porosity, can give Sxo in conventional oil and gas, or Sw in heavy
oil or bitumen. Both EPT and DPT measure about 6 inches vertically.
Logging while drilling propagation resistivity logs work
between about 100 kHz and 10 MHz. Induction and laterolog tools
work in the 10 to 100 kHz range. Below about 100 kHz, the
measurements are based on the properties of standing waves, not
of propagation.

EPT tool concept, with two transmitters and two receivers, in
end-fire (left) and broadside
(right) measuring modes. Region investigated (red) varies with
resistivity contrast between Rxo
and Rt, tool frequency, and firing mode.

Simplified log analysis of EPT is based on a time average
equation similar to the sonic log Wyllie equations:
1: TPo = (TPL^2 - ATTN^2 / 3604)^0.5
2. PHIept = (TPo - (1 - Vsh) * TPma - Vsh * TPsh)
/ (TPw - TPma)
where:
ATTN = EPT attenuation (db/m)
TPL = EPT log reading (nsec/m)
TPma = EPT matrix value (nsec/m)
TPw = EPT water value (nsec/m)
TPsh = EPT shale value (nsec/m)
In conventional oil and gas:
3: Sxo = PHIept / PHIe
If shale corrections were ignored:
4: Sxo = PHIept / PHIt
In very heavy oil, tar, or bitumen, where invasion is
minimal:
5: Sw = PHIept / PHIe
OR 6: Sw = PHIept / PHIt if shale corrections were ignored in
finding PHIept.
Depth plots of both PHIept and PHIe are commonly shaded to
show the difference, which is the hydrocarbon volume. This
difference is helpful in locating hydrocarbons and oil water
contacts in conventional oil, and may be close to actual
hydrocarbon volume in heavier oils.
Charts are available to correct ATTN and TPL for spreading,
salinity, and temperature. Some computer software ignores the
shale correct so you get water filled porosity plus clay bound
water instead of just water filled porosity.
The EPT method is somewhat insensitive to water salinity and
matrix properties as both terms have relatively narrow ranges (TPma
~~ 8 and TPw ~~ 70). It is especially useful in fresh water oil
or gas reservoirs, where resistivity methods lack sufficient
resolution to detect hydrocarbons easily.
More
elaborate methods to solve for water filled porosity are encoded
in commercial software, using the real and imaginary (phase and
amplitude) information buried in the electromagnetic signal. The
CRIM and CTA methods are documented in Schlumberger's "Log
Interpretation Principals and Applications" manual. The
dielectric constant of materials varies with the electromagnetic
frequency of the logging tool, so these more exotic methods are
required with dielectric (low frequency) logs, since propagation
time is not recorded on these logs.
Electromagnetic
PROPAGATION
LOG CURVE NAMES
EPT Log |
|
|
|
Curves |
Units |
Abbreviations |
| EPT
travel time |
nsec/m |
TPL |
| signal
level (near) |
db |
LNEAR |
| signal
level (far) |
db |
LFAR |
| attenuation |
db/m |
ATTEN |
| *
gamma ray |
api |
GR |
| caliper |
in
or mm |
CAL |
| porosity
from EPT |
%
of frac |
PHIEPT |
| |
|
|
DPT Log |
|
|
|
Curves |
Units |
Abbreviations |
| DPT permitivity |
unitless |
EPSILON |
|
resistivity |
ohm-m |
Rept |
| attenuation |
db/m |
ATTEN |
| *
gamma ray |
api |
GR |
| caliper |
in
or mm |
CAL |
| porosity
from EPT |
%
of frac |
PHIEPT |
EXAMPLES OF
Electromagnetic PROPAGATION
LOGS

EPT log with deep induction, gamma ray, neutron and density.
Zone A is gas (density neutron crossover, PHIept is low), Zone B
is oil (no crossover, PHIept is low), Zones C, D, and E are wet
(PHIept = PHIxdn).

PHIept (red) and PHIxdn (blue) in an oil zone. Oil water contact
is located where red and blue curves meet near bottom of log at
about 6860 feet. Resistivity contrast (Track 2) does not define
contact clearly. Porosity curve separation is only a
hydrocarbon locator, as this is light oil, with invasion.
|