CHAPTER
THIRTY-THREE:
STRATIGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
1
Depositional Environment
Table
of Contents
33.00 Introduction To This Chapter
33.01 Rock Facies - Origin and Depositional Environment
33.02 Classification of Depositional Environments
33.03 Sedimentary Structures
33.04 Genetic Units
33.05 Marine Transgressive Overlap - Fining Upward
Sequence
33.06 Marine Regressive Overlap - Coarsening
Upward Sequence
33.07 High Energy Marine Deposition - Cylindrical
Sequence
33.08 Curve Shape Patterns in Continental Sequences
33.09.Stratigraphic Traps
33.10 Grain Size and Depositional Environment
33.11 Dip Spread and Depositional Environment
33.12 Current Bedding and Depositional Environment
33.13 Curve Shape Analysis and Depositional Environment
33.14 In Conclusion
33.15 Exercises for Chapter Thirty-Three
33.16 Bibliography for Chapter Thirty-Three
Continue
to Chapter Thirty-Four
Publication
History: This Chapter formed part of Chapter Seven of Volume Two
of The Log Analysis Handbook, a series of course notes published
by the author in 1978. Revised 1985 and 1993. Revised and re-organized
for this electronic edition Oct 2002.
CHAPTER
THIRTY-THREE:
STRATIGRAPHIC
ANALYSIS
1
Depositional Environment
33.00
Introduction To This Chapter
This Chapter covers evaluation of depositional environment, sedimentary
models, and bedding patterns. Stratigraphic dipmeter patterns
and case histories are covered in Chapter
Thirty-Four. Interpretation of structure was covered beginning
in Chapter Thirty-One. Dipmeter tool
theory and data processing methods were described in Chapter
Twenty-Six and will not be repeated here. However, analysis
techniques which may be peculiar to sedimentary studies will be
described where appropriate.
The
sedimentary rock sequence can vary considerably in thickness,
texture, grain size, and lithology from place to place. These
differences create traps that will hold hydrocarbons which are
called stratigraphic traps. Superimposed regional or local structure
may also play a role in stratigraphic traps.
There
are only four basic kinds of stratigraphic traps: unconformities,
porosity permeability pinchouts, reefs, and drape structures.
However, within the permeability pinchout category, there are
many different types. Knowing which type is crucial to understanding
how to explore for, and develop, these reservoirs.
The
methods used to identify stratigraphic traps from logs involve
curve shape analysis for grain size and environment, analysis
of dipmeter data for definition of bedding, and conventional log
analysis calculations for porosity and lithology. In addition,
the use of formation microscanner images to assess detailed stratigraphy
is becoming more common.
The
end result of the analysis is a description of the rock facies
and a three dimensional view of the sedimentary structure. This
will include the type of structure, thickness, reservoir quality,
and if possible, its shape and probable extent.
As
with any log analysis technique, calibration and control by using
core and sample descriptions is very beneficial. In addition,
well to well correlation and mapping can be used to help confirm
stratigraphic interpretation made from dipmeter and curve shape
analysis.
33.01 Rock
Facies - Origin and Depositional Environment
A description of a rock by its detailed type, origin, and depositional
environment is usually called a facies description. It can be
derived by observation of the rocks, or inferred from analysis
and interpretation of well log data. To determine facies from
well logs requires calibration to known rocks (cores, samples,
or outcrops). Understanding the rock facies is the only way to
reconstruct the paleogeography of a rock sequence, which in turn
provides clues as to a potential reservoir's quality and lateral
extent.
Facies
description based on well logs is often called electrofacies analysis,
because electrical logs are used. However, radioactive and acoustic
data is also incorporated, so this handbook does not stress the
term electrofacies, as it is slightly misleading.
The
rock type can be derived from:
1. observation of samples
2. observation of cores
3. lithology analysis of an adequate log suite
If
the world was perfect, all three sources of data would be available
and would agree with each other. The data sources do not always
agree, so the analyst must learn to compare, contrast, and possibly
discard some data.
The
origin of a rock can be inferred from its present depositional
environment and a reconstruction of paleogeography. Both of these
can, at least sometimes, be inferred from log data, especially
from dipmeter data, which tells us about depositional energy and
direction of transport, in conjunction with other log curves,
which suggest the grain size of the rock. Log analysts usually
concentrate on depositional environment and bedding patterns,
along with dip direction and angle, and provide this information
to geologists who make subsurface maps representing the analysis.
Geologists
who do the whole job need to have special skills in open hole
log analysis and should not rely entirely on the curve shapes
of the raw logs. For example, the curve shapes on SP and gamma
ray logs may be easy to interpret in a conventional shaly sand
sequence, but could be very misleading in a complex sequence of
anhydritic, dolomitic, shaly sands bounded by carbonates.
With
this warning in mind, we will plunge into the standard topics.
33.02 Classification
of Depositional Environments
The environmental classification (Figure 33.01) is:
1. continental
2. coastal or transitional
3. marine

FIGURE
33.01: Depositional environments
Most
detrital sediments are continental or transitional, and most chemical
sediments are marine.
Continental
and transitional sediments:
1. glacial - formed by glacial action, eg. gravel
bars, drumlins
2. eolian - formed by wind action, eg. sand dunes
3. alluvial - formed by flooding or when fast moving
water dumps sediment into slow moving water, eg. deltas,
sand bars, beaches
4. fluvial - formed by a river, eg. point bars, channels
5. lacustrine - formed in a lake, eg. mudstones, marls,
chert
6. paludal or carbonaceous - formed in a marsh or
swamp, eg. peat, coal
The
first four describe detrital sediments and the last
two chemical sediments.
Marine
sedimentary rocks:
1. shelf margin - formed at the edge of the continental
shelf
2. inner shelf - formed near shore
3. outer shelf - formed farther from shore
4. atoll/pinnacle reefs - formed by biological skeletons
in shallow water
5. lagoonal/back reef - formed in the quiet shallow
water protected by a reef
6. basinal - formed in deep water
7. evaporitic - formed by evaporation of sea water
All
but the last may be biological sediments and all can
be chemical sediments. However, detrital material
can occur in nearly all of them, including evaporites. |
|
33.03
Sedimentary Structures
The term sedimentary structures refers to stratigraphic features
in the subsurface, created by erosion and deposition of sediments,
as opposed to tectonic structures created by tension, compression,
uplift, and subsidence.
There
are four basic kinds of stratigraphic traps: unconformities, porosity
or permeability pinchouts, reefs, and drape structures. River
channels, beaches, bars, and deltas are sedimentary structures,
usually associated with porosity pinchout traps. Drape structures
over these may form additional traps.
Nearly
one-third of the important oil fields of the United States are
stratigraphic traps and many were discovered by random drilling
rather than by scientific exploration methods. This indicates
that strat traps are fairly common in the subsurface and make
up a tremendous potential oil and gas resource. Today, 3-D seismic
and sequence stratigraphy have evolved to the point where start
traps can be defined quite accurately and even very small targets
are drilled on purpose instead of by accident.
The
analysis of sedimentary structures from logs, augmented by core,
sample, and seismic data, is somewhat complex. There are, however,
only a few major types of sedimentation patterns. Most of these
patterns can be represented by a set of models which serve as
a basis for interpretation and comparison by log analysts. The
methods used involve curve shape analysis for grain size and environment,
analysis of dipmeter data for definition of bedding, and conventional
log analysis calculations for porosity and lithology, followed
by geological mapping.
The
difficulties in identifying sedimentary structures, and hence
their associated facies descriptions, include the following:
1. interpretation is based on multiple lines of evidence (eg logs,
cores, inferred geometry, fossils, mineralogy) obtained concurrently
or in no special order.
2.
there may be no unique solution even if all possible data were
available.
3.
interpretation is based on the preponderance of evidence, no single
item will conclusively prove a hypothesis.
4.
absence of a feature is common, so such absences do not help the
analysis.
These
points should be seriously considered when presenting results
of a geological analysis of log data.
Sedimentary
structures can be subdivided into predepositional, syndepositional,
and postdepositional sedimentary features, which aid in describing
the sequence of events which created the structure.
Predepositional
sedimentary structures are those observed on the underside of
a bed. These include erosional features, scour marks, flute marks,
ripple marks, mud cracks, worm burrowings, grooves, and channel
cutting. Of these, only channel cutting may sometimes be recognized
on the dipmeter by the log analyst, although the smaller events
may be seen on Formation Microscanner images.
Postdepositional
sedimentary structures are those observed on the top side of a
bed. These include load casts, quicksand structures, and movement
by slump or creep. Drape due to differential compaction, and its
counterpart, sag, can be measured by the dipmeter and can be diagnostic
of certain types of sedimentary structures.
Syndepositional
sedimentary structures are those occurring within the bed and
take the form of cross bedding or current bedding. We are usually
interested in the magnitude of current bedding angles, their characteristics
such as whether the current beds are planar, wedge shaped, or
festoon type, and their variations versus depth. These factors
provide clues to the depositional mechanism, which in turn define
the significance of the structure as a potential source of hydrocarbons.
33.04 Sequence
Stratigraphy and Genetic Units
Sequence stratigraphy is a phrase used to indicate a method for
describing the depositional environment of a sequence of rocks.
The terms stratigraphic unit, genetic unit, or genetic increment
of strata (GIS) are used to describe the presence of a sedimentary
structure. A genetic unit encompasses the structure and its surroundings,
usually the interval between an upper and a lower marker bed or
lower erosional surface, with the sedimentary structure sandwiched
in between. The marker beds are usually shales. The more massive
shale beds are called maximum flooding surfaces and more minor
shales are called local flooding surfaces. The name suggests that
the breaks between successive genetic units are caused by inundation
which stops this particular depositional cycle.
In
this way, the context of the structure in its surroundings is
used to help define the structure. Figure 33.02 illustrates some
typical genetic units.

FIGURE
33.02: Sequence stratigraphy and genetic units
A GIS is made up of a series of depositional sequences, each being
a further series of conformable strata or beds, as shown in Figure
33.03. The bedding planes within the depositional sequence are
useful to us, because their dip angle and direction can tell us
something about the arrangement and possible extent of the beds.
The structure of these genetically related beds determines whether
or not a stratigraphic trap is formed.

FIGURE
33.03: Bedding planes define genetic units
A
genetic sequence of strata (GSS) is a group or series of GIS's,
laid down with reasonable continuity, ie., there are no major
unconformities or major changes in depositional environment. Thus,
a GIS may be repeated several times in vertical succession. A
GSS corresponds roughly to a formation and a GIS to a unit or
member of the formation.
33.05 Marine
Transgressive Overlap - Fining Upward Sequence
A sedimentary structure is generally initiated by the accumulation
of sediment on an old erosion surface. Deposition does not occur
everywhere at once. Sediment will be deposited gradually at a
location close to the source of sediments and will be spread outward
from the source. This process is called overlap since the new
sediments gradually overlap onto the older sediments.
Two
kinds of overlap are recognized. Transgressive overlap occurs
when the sea is advancing, or transgressing, upon a low, relatively
flat land mass. In this case the land mass is subsiding relative
to sea level. At the shore line, sand and gravel accumulate. Away
from the land, beyond the beach sands, mud is laid down, and beyond
that there may be organic oozes deposited on the sea floor. See
top half of Figure 33.04.

FIGURE
33.04: Transgressive overlap - fining upward sequence (top)
Regressive overlap - coarsening upward sequence (bottom)
The
sand, mud, and lime phases extend along the coast in three roughly
parallel belts. As the sea encroaches on the land, the three types
of deposits remain in the same relative position to each other,
but they shift landward. The beach sand and pebbles are laid down
on the old erosional surface. The mud from this phase overlies
the sand deposited earlier, and the ooze overlies the older mud
layer. Thus mud overlaps the sand and ooze overlaps the mud. This
is marine transgressive overlap, and grain size becomes finer
in the upward direction.
Thus,
a vertical section through the formation shows finer grained rocks
lying over coarser rocks, or deep water sediments over shallow
water sediments. These sands are described as "fining upward".
The gamma ray and SP curve shapes are as shown in the top of Figure
33.05, and are called bell shaped curves, due to the visual effect
generated by a pair of regular and mirror image curves. Typical
transgressive sedimentary structures are alluvial point bars in
meandering rivers and tidal channels. Delta distributary channel
fill can also show transgressive curve shapes, but more show regressive
or high energy shapes.

FIGURE 33.05: Fining upward, coarsening upward, and cylindrical
curve shapes
A
serrated or saw tooth curve shape may be superimposed on a bell
shaped curve; this is caused by interbeds of shale between the
sand layers. Such interbeds represent short periods of deeper
water deposition, possibly caused by floods or erratic transport
of sediments.
33.06 Marine
Regressive Overlap - Coarsening Upward Sequence
Regressive overlap is produced when the sea recedes from the land,
as when the land mass is uplifted or the sea bed subsides. By
this process, the beach zone migrates out over earlier offshore
muds. See Figure 33.04, bottom half. At the seaward end, mud beds
overlap the older ooze. A vertical section shows coarser material
overlying finer material, or shallow water sediments overlying
deep water sediments. These sands are described as "coarsening
upward" and have a gamma ray or SP curve shape as shown in
the center of Figure 33.05. These are called funnel shaped curves
and would be indicative of barrier bars, or the edge of delta
fronts. These curve shapes may also be serrated or saw tooth shaped.
Sea
level dropping relative to the land is not necessary for marine
regressive overlap. The same regressive sequence is produced if
the sea level is stationary and there is sufficient supply of
sediments, or even if the sea level is rising, provided the rate
of supply exceeds the rate of rise of the ocean.
Different
types of overlap often combine in the same stratigraphic section.
Thus the sea may advance on the land and then recede, so that
regressive overlap is found above transgression. This alternation
may be repeated many times.
33.07 High
Energy Marine Deposition - Cylindrical Sequence
Distributary channels in delta sequences represent high energy
deposition. At flood stage, these deposits will fill old channels
while new ones are formed. The sand bodies will be quite uniform,
with large grain size and little visible bedding. These form cylindrical
curve shapes, similar to those in the bottom illustrations on
Figure 33.05. If flooding is erratic, the curve shape may be serrated.
Similar
curve shapes can be formed in deeper water as sand slides, or
fans, formed at the end of submerged canyons. Turbidite deposits,
formed in deep water by slumping of unconsolidated slopes or by
rapid movement of heavy, silt laden water, form serrated cylindrical
curve shapes, often covering hundreds or thousands of feet of
vertical section.
33.08 Curve
Shape Patterns in Continental Sequences
Bell shaped curves are found in alluvial point bar sands, in meandering
streams, and in drape inside a channel fill. Funnel shaped curves
occur in foreset and crossbeds in channels. Cylindrical patterns
are restricted to sand dunes and scree slopes, the latter being
often serrated.
There
are obvious ambiguities between marine and continental curve shapes,
so curve shape alone will not suffice to uniquely determine environment.
With all four sources of environmental data, namely curve shape,
dip angle and spread, bedding type, and shale volume, it is usually
possible to assess the environment and hence the sedimentary structure
quite precisely. If one source is missing, especially the dip
data, life becomes more difficult, but regional knowledge will
usually fill in the gaps.
33.09 Petroleum
Traps Formed By Stratigraphy
1. Unconformities
An unconformity is a hiatus in the normal geological sequence
caused by a break in the process of deposition, by erosion, or
by structural deformation. It results in a missing amount of sediments
corresponding to a missing geological time as compared to the
normal sequence. It is made of two different series of strata
separated by a surface of unconformity.
Strictly
speaking, there are four main types of unconformities:
1. nonconformity, in which sediments overlie igneous rocks.
2. paraunconformity, in which strata are parallel on both sides
of the unconformity, but some of the rock sequence is missing,
due to lack of deposition (not due to erosion).
3. disconformity, in which strata are also parallel on both sides,
but there is an erosional surface as well as the missing section.
Lack of deposition may also have occurred.
4. angular unconformity, in which the strata above and below are
not parallel. Erosion has almost always taken place.
The
last two mentioned are the only ones to concern us, and are illustrated
in Figure 33.06.
FIGURE
33.06: Unconformities and disconformity
The
contact between sedimentary layers and intrusive salt, gypsum,
and shale domes is very similar to an angular unconformity, but
the process is caused by compression and the traps are considered
to be structural rather than stratigraphic.
Unconformities
can be classified:
1.
according to lateral extent as:
- regional, occurs across a large area or possibly the entire
basin
- local, occurs over a small area
2.
according to the amount of missing geological time as:
- major, where a long time sequence is missing
- minor, where a short time span is missing
Since
there is no change in dip trend between the upper and lower strata
of a paraunconformity or a disconformity, it may go completely
unnoticed except for changes in microfossils. However, a disconformity
may be detected by the following features:
-
weathered zone, reflecting the effects of the work of ground water,
such as solution vugs or caverns, brecchia, jumbled rock, or cross
bedding occurring immediately above or below the the disconformity
surface.
-
local erosion, which can result in a local high or local low at
the unconformity surface. When deposition resumes, this dipping
surface is filled by the overlying sediments. The erosional surface
is sometimes apparent on logs.
Disconformities
and angular unconformities are relatively easy to spot on a dipmeter
log; they are the so-called black patterns, or major changes in
dip angle or direction. The dip of bedding planes above an angular
unconformity differs from that of the bedding planes below. The
underlying strata have been tilted during the period of non-deposition.
Like faults, angular unconformities are characterized by a change
of trend of dip (either dip angle or dip azimuth or both). In
addition, erosion may cut a pre-existing structure and produce
an irregular topography, characterized by varying dip angles and
directions on the old surface.
There
may be no significant curve shape anomaly at an unconformity,
for example where one shale bed lies unconformably on another.
There may be a resistivity or apparent porosity change due to
differences in silt content or shale compaction. If the unconformity
is at the top of a sandstone, the erosional surface may create
a very sharp break at the top of a regressive sequence or at the
top of a high energy sequence, but may go unnoticed at the top
of a transgressive sequence.
It
is easy to mistake a fault for an angular unconformity and vice
versa, based on dip information only. In general, dip is steeper
below the unconformity surface than above it, although more recent
tilting may have altered this relationship. Weathering, local
erosion, and change in rock quality may occur at an angular unconformity
as well as at a disconformity, and gouge or brecchia may occur
at a fault. Both cases produce erratic dips at the boundary.
Unconformities
and disconformities do not always form traps, but if porous rock
lies below and shale above the unconformity, the regional picture
may provide the trapping mechanism, especially in the case of
angular unconformities. The most familiar unconformity sand trap
in the United States is the East Texas field; it has produced
over 3.1 billion barrels of oil since its discovery.
A
similar unconformity in Canada, with far less reserves, is formed
by the Mississippian unconformity, capped by Jurassic shales.
Similar traps, not too far away, occur where the Jurassic sandstones
pinch out under the Lower Cretaceous shales. A typical unconformity
trap is illustrated in Figure 33.07.

FIGURE 33.07: Typical unconformity trap
2.
Porosity Permeability Pinchouts
As a general rule, shallow water sandstone beds are likely to
thin, and deeper water beds such as limestones are likely to thicken,
away from the shoreline. If a rock layer continues to thin in
a certain direction, it may finally pinchout or lense-out altogether.
The beds above and below it will then become contiguous. This
can happen to blanket sands, beaches, bars, and delta fronts and
are called sand pinchouts. River channel fill and point bars in
meandering streams and rivers thin toward their edges; this effect
is also called a pinchout. The thin edge of any sand body can
be described as a pinchout.
The
large Pembina field in Alberta is a good example of this type
of trap. These traps extend for many miles along a fairly narrow
belt at the updip limit of the sand. Although sand pinchouts are
stratigraphic traps, folding and faulting may be important in
controlling production.
Frequently
porous limestone or dolomite grades updip into a non-porous rock.
These are called porosity permeability pinchouts and may be of
local or regional importance. The Carthage gas field in east Texas
is an excellent example of a permeability pinchout. The producing
limestone grades updip into an impermeable limestone that is barren.
Later arching of the sediments formed the Carthage pool that covers
nearly 250,000 acres.
Typical
examples are shown on Figure 33.08.

FIGURE
33.08: Sand pinchout (top) and Sand channel (bottom)
A
porosity permeability trap is formed when the thin edge of the
porosity is updip from the thicker part of the zone, as in the
top half of Figure 33.09.

FIGURE
33.09: Permeability pinchout trap (shaly sand shown, similar traps
are also formed in carbonates)
Obviously
very complex combinations of deltas, cut by channels, and faced
by offshore marine bars can exist. An example is shown in Figure
33.10. The same comment is true in river channel cut and fill
situations where meandering streams can provide a complex depositional
pattern, unfortunately seen only as isolated one dimensional views
by the logs run in the well bore.

FIGURE 33.10: Complex stratigraphic traps
3.
Reef Traps
Reefs are productive in many parts of the world. Many types exist,
such as atolls, table reefs, pinnacle reefs, barrier reefs, fringing
reefs, biostromes, and bioherms. They occur as small dome like
features that may be reflected in the overlying sediments by drape.
Drape is described in the next section of this Chapter. Some reef
trends extend for hundreds of miles, such as the Leduc reef trend
in Alberta. The size of a reef ranges from a few acres to several
square miles. Seismic exploration is the best way to find reefs.
The
reef core grows upward and usually outward as the sea level rises.
Detrital reef material falls on the ocean side, forming the fore
reef. The back reef is formed on the lagoon or quiet side by deposition
of limestone and lime mud, illustrated in Figure 33.11.

FIGURE 33.11: Reef trap
If
sea level rises too fast, the reef may drown and die. If water
level drops it may begin to grow again, forming very complex structures.
Some examples are shown in Figures 33.12.

FIGURE
33.12: Complex lithology of a Devonian reef
Reefs
are usually easily identified by draping dips, often extending
several hundred to a few thousand feet above the reef. Dips in
the reef core and fore reef are erratic, and those in the back
reef may be visible or nonexistent.
4. Drape Traps
Differential
compaction causes drape over reefs and sand bodies and this can
form traps. A sandstone or carbonate layer above the bar or reef
can be bent in such a way as to have closure, that is, the ability
to contain and trap hydrocarbons. The bending is caused by the
fact that the reef or sand body does not compress to the same
degree as the shales to either side of it. Therefore a topographic
high can be propagated upward through the section for quite some
distance.
FIGURE
33.13: Drape and sag
These
traps look like folds in a cross section or on the dipmeter patterns.
They were not formed by tectonic activity, but rather by the sedimentary
process itself. Dips underneath the reef or bar will be regional,
in contrast to the anticline. Drape is important in identifying
sedimentary structures from dipmeter data, and is often overlooked
as a trapping mechanism in the beds lying above the target formation.
Drape
is illustrated schematically in Figure 33.13 for both the reef
and the sand bar case. Channel fill can also cause drape, again
due to differential compaction of surrounding shale. Bedding inside
the channel may be complex, but is usually regional under the
channel. However, the mass of a reef or channel sand may compact
the rock under the body, causing apparent sag below the base of
the zone.
33.10
Grain Size and Depositional Environment
There are four primary ways to estimate depositional environment
from well logs:
1. shale volume/grain size analysis
2. dip spread/water depth analysis
3. bedding angle/bedding type analysis
4. curve shape/depositional sequence analysis
All
of the techniques rely on a strong correlation between depositional
environment and the energy needed to produce certain characteristics
that we can see on well logs over the rock sequence.
Depositional
energy level correlates well to grain size, which in turn is usually
proportional to shale volume. Thus the gamma ray or SP curve can
augment environment estimates from dipmeter analysis. Low values
of gamma ray (or high SP) indicate high energy, low shale content
zones. These are inner shelf or upper continental slope in a marine
environment, or alluvial or fluvial regimes on the continent.
Higher
shale volume indicates lower energy deposition; that is, deeper
water outer shelf, lower continental slope, continental lacrustine,
or paludal environments.
Curve
shape analysis depends almost entirely on the shape of the SP
or GR curves versus depth, so the shale volume/grain size/depositional
energy relationship is a strong component of our analysis method.
The reconstructed resistivity curve from the dipmeter or a microresistivity
curve can also be used as a grain size indicator in shaly sand
sequences. An example is shown in Figure 33.14 from a SYNDIP presentation.

FIGURE
33.14: Grain size estimates from log curves (SYNDIP)
A combination of curve shape and bedding patterns are used to
differentiate the ambiguity obvious in the above discussion. Grain
size alone, as indicated by shale content, is not a sufficient
criteria to determine the environment, but it does help distinguish
high, medium, and low energy environments.
33.11
Dip Spread and Depositional Environment
For most situations, the spread in the dip angle values correlates
to energy level, as shown in Figures 33.15 and 33.16.

FIGURE 33.15: Depositional environment, water depth, and dip
scatter

FIGURE
33.16: Dip scatter and water depth
The
continental slope and abyssal plain zones also have distinctive
energy patterns, with very high energy at the upper slope, due
to slumping and turbidity currents. Energy levels decrease rapidly
with distance from the upper slope. This results in dip ranges
of 60 degrees in the upper slope zone to a few degrees in the
abyss, corresponding to Zones 4, 5, and 6 in Figure 33.15.
Dips
on the continental zone range up to 20 degrees for fluvial deposits
and 45 degrees for eolian and alluvial deposits.
Dip
Spread in Various Depositional Environments
| Zone |
Energy |
Features |
Grain |
Dip
Range |
Water
Depth |
| |
Level |
|
Size |
degrees |
feet |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Continental |
High |
Scree
slopes |
V.
Coarse |
20
- 45 |
0
- 50 |
| Zone
0 |
|
Alluvial
fans |
Coarse |
0
- 30 |
|
| |
Medium |
Braided
stream |
Medium |
0
- 20 |
|
| |
|
Point
bars |
Fine |
0
- 20 |
|
| |
Low |
Channel
fill |
V.Fine |
0
- 10 |
|
| |
High |
Glacial
till |
Mixed |
scattered |
|
| |
|
Eolian
dunes |
Coarse |
10
- 45 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Inner
Shelf |
High |
Sand
bars |
Coarse |
0
- 30 |
0
- 50 |
| Zone
1 |
|
Tidal
channels |
Medium |
0
- 25 |
|
| |
|
Ebb
deltas |
|
0
- 25 |
|
| |
|
Flood
deltas |
|
0
- 20 |
|
| |
|
Washover
fans |
|
0
- 20 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Middle
Shelf |
Medium |
Distributary |
Medium |
0
- 15 |
50
- 300 |
| Zone
2 |
|
channels |
|
|
|
| |
|
Longshore
current |
|
0
- 15 |
|
| |
|
channels |
|
|
|
| |
|
Distributary |
Coarse |
0
- 20 |
|
| |
|
fronts |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Outer
Shelf |
Low |
Distributary |
Fine |
0
- 5 |
300
- 600 |
| Zone
3 |
|
channels |
|
|
|
| |
|
Longshore
current |
|
0
- 5 |
|
| |
|
channels |
|
|
|
| |
|
Distributary |
Medium |
0
- 5 |
|
| |
|
fronts |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Upper
Slope |
High |
Slide
cut channels |
Coarse |
0
- 60 |
600
- 1000 |
| Zone
4 |
|
Turbidite
fans |
|
0
- 60 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lower
Slope |
Medium |
Slide
cut channels |
Medium |
0
- 25 |
1000
- 3000 |
| Zone
5 |
|
Turbidite
fans |
|
0
- 25 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Abyssal
Plain |
Low |
Turbidite
Fans |
Fine |
0
- 5 |
3000+ |
| Zone
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even
though energy level, water depth, and grain size can be inferred
from logs, this is still not enough information to segregate all
sedimentary structures.
33.12 Current
Bedding and Depositional Environment
The geometry of a sandstone unit is related to its internal structures,
which are functions of its depositional environment. The internal
structure is influenced mostly by current bedding. The direction
of paleocurrents is indicated by the orientation of the current
bedding, which can be measured by using dipmeter data after removal
of structural dip. This direction is an aid to tracking the reservoir,
but the correct model for the reservoir must be chosen before
the direction information is of any use.
The
term current bedding is used to describe the beds laid down in
a channel parallel to the direction of current flow. The current
beds will dip downward in the direction of the current flow and
will be from a few inches to a few feet thick.
Crossbedding,
although the term suggests otherwise, is also parallel to the
direction of current flow. However, crossbeds do not often occur
in river channels but usually on the front of deltas or shallow
marine sand bars. Crossbeds dip considerably more steeply, but
in the same direction, as the dips of the delta or sand bar surface.
Planar
or tabular bedding, as the words suggest, involve flat layers
of rock (maybe lying at an angle) laid down in streams, lakes,
or in deltas. Festoon bedding creates layers which are convex
top and bottom, and are usually laid down in braided streams.
Wedge shaped or nonparallel bedding is planar bedding with concurrent
erosion which has removed a portion of the bed, such as on the
curve of a meandering river. Examples of these bedding patterns
are given in Figure 33.17.

FIGURE 33.17: Bedding patterns
As
described earlier, a strong correlation exists between depositional
energy and grain size of the rocks. The larger the grain size,
the greater the depositional energy. Therefore, steep current
bedding, which can only be supported by large grains, is usually
interpreted as high energy deposition. Flatter beds represent
lower energy deposition. This rule usually holds when deposition
occurs in a place away from the transportation artery, such as
in a delta front or when deposition is associated with ocean wave
energy.
However,
this rule could be broken when deposition and transportation occur
simultaneously, as in a channel, where the highest energy may
produce the flattest, even reversed, current bedding dips. An
example is torrential bedding, illustrated at the bottom of Figure
33.17.
Specific
sedimentary environments give rise to characteristic patterns
of current bedding dips versus depth. Such patterns, seen on the
dipmeter plot, can be used to help identify the depositional environment.
For example, most bar type deposits will exhibit a high dip angle
in the upper part, decreasing to a low angle near the base.
Bedding
Characteristics in Various Depositional Environments
| |
|
|
| Depositional |
Current
Bedding |
Current
Bedding |
| Environment |
Characteristics |
Orientation |
| |
|
|
| Glacial
deposits |
None
or very fine varves |
Non
or down paleoslope |
| |
|
Direction
of sand elongation |
| |
|
|
| Braided
stream |
Festoon
(trough) type |
Unimodal
large scatter |
| alluvium |
Steep
dip |
Generally
down pateoslope |
| |
|
Direction
of sand elongation |
| |
|
|
| Meandering
stream |
Festoon
(trough) type |
Unimodal
- severe scatter |
| point
bars |
Large
dip spread |
Generally
down paleoslope |
| |
Higher
angle at base |
Direction
of meander belt and |
| |
Low
angle tabular at top |
sand
body alignment |
| |
|
|
| Eolian
dunes |
Tabular
- high angle |
Little
scatter |
| |
Extremely
consistent |
No
relation to paleoslope |
| |
Decreasing
angle at base |
Normal
to sand elongation |
| |
|
|
| Delta
distributary |
Festoon
- tabular |
Unimodal
- moderate scatter |
| channels |
Higher
angle at base |
In
seaward direction |
| |
Moderate
spread |
Direction
of sand elongation |
| |
|
|
| Distributary
mouth |
Tabular
moderate angle |
Unimodal
- radiation |
| bars |
(>10
degrees) |
seaward
direction but |
| influenced |
|
|
| |
Higher
angle at top |
by
longshore currents |
| |
Moderate
spread |
Direction
of sand elongation |
| |
(Lobate) |
|
| |
|
|
| Estuarine
& tidal |
Tabular
- low angle |
Bimodal
(180 deg) - |
| scattered |
|
|
| channels |
(<10
degrees) |
Normal
to coastline |
| |
Higher
angle at base |
Direction
of sand |
| elongation |
|
|
| |
Flatter
at top |
|
| |
|
|
| Beaches
and bars |
Tabular |
Unimodal
- possibly bimodal |
| |
Low
angle on seaward |
Usually
down paleoslope |
| but |
|
|
| |
Side
(<10 deg) |
possibly
reversed |
| |
High
angle on lagoonal |
Normal
to sand elongation |
| |
side
(<20 deg) |
|
| |
|
|
| Marine
shelf |
Tabular |
Polymodal
- random sands |
| |
Very
low angle throughout |
|
| |
|
|
| Turbidites |
Tabular
or absent |
Unimodal |
| |
Very
low angle throughout |
Down
paleoslope |
| |
Rarely
observable |
Direction
of sand elongation |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
This
table is adapted from "Reservoir Delineation By Wireline
Techniques" by J.F.Goetz, W.J.Prins, and J.F.Logan, published
in The Log Analyst, June, 1977.
To
evaluate current bedding, its characteristics (type, angle, pattern,
spread) and its orientation (direction and scatter) are considered
together. The above tables should be used in conjunction with
the sedimentary model descriptions given later in this Chapter.
In
case of a conflict between evidence supplied by the various approaches,
current bedding patterns should overrule curve shapes, because
the dipmeter has better resolution. This extends to the determination
of the boundaries of genetic units. Sometimes the incoming material
may change while the same depositional conditions persist, with
the result that lithological unit boundaries may not match those
of genetic units. One genetic unit may be made up of more than
one lithological unit or vice versa. Interpretation involving
sedimentary structures is based on genetic units and should not
be too strongly influenced by lithology variations.
33.13
Curve Shape Analysis and Depositional Environment
Grain size and bedding both influence the overall curve shape
of a log versus depth. There are four basic curve shapes:
1.
straight line, indicating constant shale, evaporite, clean sand,
or carbonate, caused by continuous deep water deposition
2.
bell shaped, indicating a fining upward sequence, ie., lower energy
at the end of a cycle
3.
funnel shaped, indicating a coarsening upward sequence, ie higher
energy at the end of a cycle
4.
cylindrical shaped, indicating constant energy throughout the
cycle
The
last three are the usual patterns considered in an environment
analysis. Variations exist. Serrated patterns are caused by abrupt
changes in energy, resulting in layers of silt or shale interbedded
in an otherwise regular pattern. Short patterns way be imbedded
in longer ones. Thus, short coarsening upward patterns may contribute
to a larger coarsening upward pattern. Patterns of all three kinds
may be imbedded in one larger one.
Examples are illustrated in Figure 33.18.

FIGURE 33.18: Fining upward, coarsening upward, and cylindrical
curve shape
Curve
Shapes in Various Depositional Environments
| |
|
|
| Curve
Shape |
|
|
| Pattern |
Characteristics |
Represents |
| Bell |
Transitional
upper boundary |
Alluvial
point bar sands |
| |
Abrupt
lower boundary |
Distributary
channel fill |
| |
Smooth
or serrated |
Transgressive
marine sand |
| |
|
Drape
over reef |
| |
|
Drape
inside channel |
| |
|
Tidal
channel |
| |
|
|
| Funnel |
Abrupt
upper boundary |
Barrier
bar |
| |
Transitional
lower boundary |
Delta
front |
| |
Smooth
or serrated |
Regressive
marine sand |
| |
|
Crossbedding |
| |
|
Foreset
bedding |
| |
|
Distributary
front |
| |
|
Distributary
mouth bar |
| |
|
|
| Cylinder |
Abrupt
top and bottom |
Distributary
channel fill |
| |
Smooth
or serrated |
Turbidite
fan |
| |
|
Submarine
canyon fan |
| |
|
Eolian
Dunes |
| |
|
|
| Funnel
- Bell |
Transitional
top and bottom |
Marine
shelf sand |
| |
|
Turbidite |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| Straight
line |
No
character |
Deep
water continuous |
| |
|
deposition |
| |
|
Carbonate
bank |
| |
|
Marine
shale |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
These shapes are most obvious on gamma ray and SP curves, but
may also be derived from resistivity (on a logarithmic scale),
porosity, or a computed curve. In particular, the synthetic resistivity
curve on the dipmeter arrow plot or SYNDIP presentation are widely
used.
Combining
the rules for grain size indicators, dip spread, current bedding
and curve shape is a formidable task. Add to this the palynology
and paleontology (micro and macro fossils), as well as the lithology
descriptions, and you have an almost undecipherable problem to
solve. A rule based expert system could be constructed from the
tables given above. An example is shown in Figure 33.19, from
a USGS program. A more elaborate program, Dipmeter Advisor, utilizing
dipmeter patterns was described in Chapter
Twenty-Six.

FIGURE
33.19: USGS expert system to determine depositional environment
33.14 In Conclusion
This chapter has reviewed the origin and classification of sedimentary
and stratigraphic features. These structures often can be identified
by characteristic log curve shapes and dipmeter patterns. Without
dipmeter data, curve shape analysis can be ambiguous. Sufficient
geological constraints, local knowledge, and experience serve
to improve skills and speed analysis. Modern computer processing,
in particular dip-removed arrow plots and stick plots, are essential
ingredients for reducing ambiguity and error.
33.15
Exercises for Chapter Thirty-Three
Exercise 33.01: Stratigraphic Analysis Concepts
1.
Define the terms: sedimentary structure, facies, and depositional
environments. (10 marks)
2.
Explain how grain size and depositional environment are related.
(10 marks)
|