| 
					
					
					 
				Capillary pressure curves define irreducible water
				saturation SWir (vertical  
 The difference between Sw and SWir, and relative permeability of water and hydrocarbon, determine the water cut. These concepts are best described by the capillary pressure curve and relative permeability curves illustrated above. 
 Irreducible water saturation is a necessary value for water cut and permeability calculations. 
 STEP 1: Find Buckles number from special core analysis or from log analysis in a known clean pay zone that produced initially with zero water cut. 1: KBUCKL = PHIe * Sw (in a CLEAN zone that produced initially with no water, or from core data) 
 STEP 2: Solve for irreducible water saturation in each zone. 2: IF zone is obviously hydrocarbon bearing 3: THEN SWir = Sw 4: OTHERWISE SWir = KBUCKL / PHIe / (1 – Vsh) 5: IF SWir > Sw 6: THEN SWir = Sw 
 
				An easier,
				but equivalent, model is: 
 
				
				
				 
				
				Reference: 
				
				 
 · Buckles Number can be found by observing the porosity times water saturation product in pay zones where RW@FT is known, or where a water zone can be used to calibrate RW@FT. Data can also be found from capillary pressure data. 
 · If Sw is greater than SWir, then the zone will produce with some water cut (if it produces anything at all). 
 · If Sw is less than SWir, then the Buckles number for the layer is wrong. 
 · The (1 – Vsh) term can be replaced by (1 – Vsh^2) if needed. 
 · Calibrate water saturation to core by preparing a porosity vs SWir graph from capillary pressure data. Adjust KBUCKL, Vsh, PHIe until a satisfactory match is achieved. 
 
 
				
				
				 Sandstones Carbonates KBUCKL Very fine grain Chalky 0.120 Fine grain Cryptocrystalline 0.060 Medium grain Intercrystalline 0.030 Coarse grain Sucrosic 0.020 Conglomerate Fine vuggy 0.010 Unconsolidated Coarse vuggy 0.005 Fractured Fractured 0.001 
					Gas Shale                                                    
					0.009 - 0.025 
			
			 
 
			 
 
				
				
				
				 The NMR transform is illustrated below. The matrix and dry clay terms of NMR response are zero. An NMR log run today can display clay bound water (CBW), irreducible water (capillary bound water, BVI), and mobile fluids (hydrocarbon plus water, BVM), also called free fluids or free fluid index (FFI). On older logs, only free fluids (FFI) is recorded and some subtractions, based on other open hole logs, are required. 
 
				 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Response to Fluids 
			
				 7: PHIt = CBW + BVI + BVM 8: PHIe = BVI + BVM 
				9: SWir = BVI /
				(BVI + BVM) 
 Some or all of the sums defined above may be displayed on the delivered log. Log presentation is far from standard for NMR logs. PHIt and PHIe from NMR do not always agree with that derived from density neutron methods, which see much larger volumes of rock. 
 
				For older logs, the BVI measurement was not
				possible, so: 
			
			 
 
			 Only sample 1 in the above table behaves close to asymptotically, as in curve A in the schematic illustration at the right. All other samples behave like curves B and C (or worse). The real cap pressure curves for samples 1 and 2 are shown below. 
 
			 
			The summary table shows wetting phase saturation
			selected by observation of  the cap pressure graphs at two different
			heights above free water, namely 100 meters and 425 meters in this
			example. In this case, the 100 meter data gives water saturations
			that we commonly see in petrophysical analysis of well logs in
			hydrocarbon bearing Bakken reservoirs in Saskatchewan. This is a
			pragmatic way to indicate the water saturation to be expected when a
			Bakken reservoir is at or near irreducible water saturation. The
			data for the 450 meter case is considerably lower and probably does
			not represent reservoir conditions in this region of the Williston
			Basin.  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
			
			Page Views ---- Since 01 Jan 2015 Copyright 2023 by Accessible Petrophysics Ltd. CPH Logo, "CPH", "CPH Gold Member", "CPH Platinum Member", "Crain's Rules", "Meta/Log", "Computer-Ready-Math", "Petro/Fusion Scripts" are Trademarks of the Author | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



 IRREDUCIBLE Water
					Saturation - BUCKLE'S METHOD
					IRREDUCIBLE Water
					Saturation - BUCKLE'S METHOD

 
 
			

 In
			higher permeability rock, the cap pressure curve quickly reaches an
			asymptote and the minimum saturation usually represents the
			irreducible water saturation in an undepleted hydrocarbon reservoir
			above the transition zone. In tight rock, the asymptote is seldom
			reached, so we pick saturation values from the cap pressure curves
			at two heights (or equivalent) Pc values) to represent two extremes
			of  reservoir condition.
In
			higher permeability rock, the cap pressure curve quickly reaches an
			asymptote and the minimum saturation usually represents the
			irreducible water saturation in an undepleted hydrocarbon reservoir
			above the transition zone. In tight rock, the asymptote is seldom
			reached, so we pick saturation values from the cap pressure curves
			at two heights (or equivalent) Pc values) to represent two extremes
			of  reservoir condition.

