
Publication History:
This article is based on
"Crain's Data Acquisition" by E.
R. (Ross) Crain, P.Eng., first published in 2010.
This
webpage version is the copyrighted intellectual property of
the author.
Do not copy or distribute in any form without explicit
permission. 
CORE PERMEABILITY BASICS
Permeability is an intrinsic property of a
reservoir rock that indicates the flow capacity of the
reservoir. Reservoir engineers use permeability, reservoir pressure, and a few other
parameters to estimate oil and gas productivity. Petrophysicists
use core permeability values to help calibrate permeability derived
from well log data.
The Darcy flow equation defines permeability, and after some
rearrangement, is used to calculate permeability from laboratory
measurements.
1: Q = K * A * (P1
 P2) / (u * L)
Where:
Q = flow rate
K = permeability
A = area
P1  P2 = pressure drop
L = path length
u = dynamic viscosity (aka absolute viscosity or viscosity)
To measure the permeability in the lab, dry gas is usually
used (air, N2, and He) in permeability determination because of
its convenience,
availability, and to minimize fluidrock reaction. The
measurement of the permeability should be restricted to the low
(laminar/viscous) flow rate region, where the pressure remains
proportional to flow rate within the experimental error. At low
pressures, we assume the gases follow the ideal gas law.
Permeability measured with a single fluid in the rock is
called absolute or intrinsic permeability (Ka). It is often
measured using dry air, giving rise to the term "air
permeability" (Kair). Nitrogen and carbon dioxide are also used.
When water is used as the single fluid, the result is called
"liquid permeability" (Kliq). Air perm is usually a little
higher than liquid perm. The Klinkenberg correction is used to
reduce air perm to an equivalent liquid perm.
Effective permeability is the permeability of a rock to one
fluid in a two phase system. For example, the effective
permeability of oil in an oilwater system (Ko) will be less
than absolute permeability. In the same rock and fluid system,
the effective permeability of water (Kw) could be higher or
lower than Ko.
Relative permeability
is the ratio of the effective permeability of a fluid at a
given saturation to some base permeability.
•Base
permeability is typically defined as
–absolute
permeability (Ka),
–air
permeability (Kair),
or effective
permeability to nonwetting phase at irreducible wetting
phase saturation, for example
Ko @ Sw
= SWir. Because the
definition of base permeability varies, the definition used
must always be confirmed before applying relative
permeability data
•noted along
with tables and figures presenting relative permeability
data.
LAB PROCEDURE FOR MEASURING AIR PERMEABILITY
Cut core plugs from whole core
or use sample from whole core
Clean core and extract reservoir fluids, then dry the core
Flow a fluid through core at several flow rates
Record inlet and outlet pressures for each
Laboratory apparatus for measuring permeability using air
and Darcy's Law
LAB PROCEDURE FOR MEASURING LIQUID
PERMEABILITY
Measure inlet and outlet pressures (P1
and P2) at several different flow rates
Graph ratio of flow rate to area (q/A) versus the pressure
function (P1  P2) / L
For laminar flow, data follow a straight line with slope of
k/μ
At very high flow rates, turbulent flow is indicated by a
deviation from straight line
Finding permeability with liquid or high rate gas flow
KLINKENBERG EFFECT
Klinkenberg discovered that permeability measurements
made with air as the flowing fluid showed different results from
permeability measurements made with a liquid as the flowing
fluid. Air permeability is always greater than the permeability
obtained when a liquid is the flowing fluid. On the basis of the
laboratory experiments, liquids had a zero velocity at a
grain surface, while gases exhibited some finite velocity at the
same grain surface (slippage). This slippage results in a higher
flow rate for the gas at a given pressure differential. Klinkenberg also found that, for a given porous medium, as the
mean pressure increased, the calculated permeability
decreased.
Klinkenberg
developed a method to correct gas permeability measured at low
mean flowing pressure to equivalent liquid permeability. A plot
of measured permeability versus 1/Pm is extrapolated to the
point where 1/Pm = 0 (Pm = infinity). This permeability
approximates the liquid permeability.
2: Pm = (P1 + P2) / 2
3: Kg = K_{L}
+ C * (1 / PM)
The factor C varies with permeability so it must be
determined for each core plug. There are generalized iterative
equations to solve for C, but they are not widely used.
PERMEABILITY FROM MICROCT
SCANS
Permeability is traditionally measured in the laboratory on
regularly shaped rock samples by forcing a fluid through the
rock and recording the resulting fluid flux and pressure drops.
CT Scanning complements and vastly expands laboratory
permeability data sets by numerically simulating fluid flow
through a direct digital representation of a real pore space
obtained by highresolution 3D imaging. Such imaging and
simulations can be rapidly and massively conducted on physical
samples of irregular shapes and sizes that are impossible to
handle in the conventional laboratory. The pore volume and pore
size determined from the CT Scan are manipulated mathematically
by simu;ating the NavierStokes equation using the LatticeBoltzman
Method, as shown below.
The slow
viscous flow needed for such
permeability estimates is simulated
using the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM).
LBM mathematically mimics the NavierStokes
equations of viscous flow by treating
the fluid as a set of particles with
certain interaction rules. Its great
advantage over directly solving the
equations of flow is that it directly
handles the boundary conditions on a
complex realistic pore surface. The
outcomes are consistent datasets of
permeability versus porosity
correlations and pore geometries for
various rock types, including tight gas
sandstone, carbonates, and friable tar
sands.
The
absolute permeability is computed in a
manner analogous to a laboratory
measurement: a pressure head or body
force is directly applied to a digital
sample. The resulting fluid flux is then
computed and permeability is calculated
according to the Darcy's equation.
Source:
www.ingrainrocks.com.
SAMPLE CORE ANALYSIS REPORT
02181815W4 
#23708 
731011 

NOTE: Accumap has Kvert in K90 Column 
S# 
Top 
Base 
Len 
Kmax 
K90 
Kvert 
Poros 
GrDen 
BkDen 
Soil 
Swtr 
Lithology 

feet 
feet 
feet 
mD 
mD 
mD 
Frac 
Kg/m3 
Kg/m3 
frac 
frac 

1 
3499.19 
3500.17 
0.98 
742.0 
0.0 
180.0 
0.283 
0 
0 
0.129 
0.448 
SS VFF 
2 
3500.17 
3501.16 
0.98 
1196.0 
0.0 
694.0 
0.297 
0 
0 
0.123 
0.450 
SS VFF 
3 
3501.16 
3502.17 
1.02 
622.0 
0.0 
266.0 
0.276 
0 
0 
0.111 
0.520 
SS VFF 
4 
3502.17 
3503.16 
0.98 
223.0 
0.0 
50.5 
0.271 
0 
0 
0.129 
0.479 
SS VFF 
5 
3503.16 
3503.88 
0.72 
837.0 
0.0 
171.0 
0.278 
0 
0 
0.110 
0.504 
SS VFF PY 
6 
3503.88 
3504.57 
0.69 
407.0 
0.0 
113.0 
0.287 
0 
0 
0.118 
0.466 
SS VFF 
7 
3504.57 
3504.67 
0.10 

0.0 
0.0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
SH 
8 
3504.67 
3505.26 
0.59 
514.0 
0.0 
365.0 
0.253 
0 
0 
0.151 
0.398 

9 
3505.26 
3505.49 
0.23 
100.0 
0.0 
2.6 
0.201 
0 
0 
0.134 
0.358 
SS VFF SH INC 
10 
3505.49 
3505.98 
0.49 
401.0 
0.0 
120.0 
0.254 
0 
0 
0.143 
0.268 
SS VFF SHBKS 
11 
3505.98 
3506.96 
0.98 
478.0 
0.0 
302.0 
0.282 
0 
0 
0.131 
0.471 
SS VFF 
12 
3506.96 
3507.88 
0.92 
431.0 
0.0 
100.0 
0.243 
0 
0 
0.156 
0.399 
SS VFF CARB INC 
13 
3507.88 
3508.47 
0.59 
777.0 
0.0 
556.0 
0.277 
0 
0 
0.119 
0.389 
SS VFF 
14 
3508.47 
3508.87 
0.39 
831.0 
0.0 
383.0 
0.275 
0 
0 
0.136 
0.422 
SS VFF CARB BK 
15 
3508.87 
3509.88 
1.02 
413.0 
0.0 
262.0 
0.281 
0 
0 
0.132 
0.440 
SS VFF 
16 
3509.88 
3510.87 
0.98 
604.0 
0.0 
425.0 
0.277 
0 
0 
0.131 
0.323 
SS VFF SH INC 
17 
3510.87 
3511.88 
1.02 
320.0 
0.0 
35.1 
0.229 
0 
0 
0.146 
0.422 
SS VFF SH INC 
18 
3511.88 
3512.87 
0.98 
616.0 
0.0 
437.0 
0.239 
0 
0 
0.103 
0.354 
SS VFF 
19 
3512.87 
3513.79 
0.92 
259.0 
0.0 
62.0 
0.261 
0 
0 
0.073 
0.418 
SS VFF 
20 
3513.79 
3514.38 
0.59 
320.0 
0.0 
26.8 
0.219 
0 
0 
0.096 
0.441 

21 
3514.38 
3515.07 
0.69 
431.0 
0.0 
82.5 
0.236 
0 
0 
0.119 
0.387 
SS VFF 
22 
3515.07 
3515.16 
0.10 

0.0 
0.0 





SH PY 
23 
3515.16 
3516.18 
1.02 
969.0 
0.0 
628.0 
0.270 
0 
0 
0.044 
0.492 
SS VFF 
24 
3516.18 
3516.77 
0.59 
837.0 
0.0 
634.0 
0.280 
0 
0 
0.042 
0.501 
SS VFF 
25 
3516.77 
3517.46 
0.69 
556.0 
0.0 
201.0 
0.273 
0 
0 
0.050 
0.531 
SS VFF CARB INC 
26 
3517.46 
3518.28 
0.82 
706.0 
0.0 
338.0 
0.262 
0 
0 
0.046 
0.487 
SS VFF 
27 
3518.28 
3519.07 
0.79 
502.0 
0.0 
377.0 
0.238 
0 
0 
0.079 
0.494 
SS VFF CARB INC 
28 
3519.07 
3519.99 
0.92 
1136.0 
0.0 
183.0 
0.263 
0 
0 
0.063 
0.501 
SS VFF 
29 
3519.99 
3520.58 
0.59 
825.0 
0.0 
291.0 
0.265 
0 
0 
0.052 
0.563 

30 
3520.58 
3521.46 
0.89 
1346.0 
0.0 
706.0 
0.274 
0 
0 
0.055 
0.516 
SS VFF 
31 
3521.46 
3522.48 
1.02 
389.0 
0.0 
102.0 
0.246 
0 
0 
0.064 
0.450 
SS VFF/M CARB INC 
32 
3522.48 
3523.47 
0.98 
165.0 
0.0 
11.9 
0.219 
0 
0 
0.058 
0.408 
SS VFF/M CARB INC 
33 
3523.47 
3524.48 
1.02 
586.0 
0.0 
66.0 
0.219 
0 
0 
0.082 
0.411 

34 
3524.48 
3525.47 
0.98 
1035.0 
0.0 
395.0 
0.244 
0 
0 
0.051 
0.391 
SS VFF 
35 
3525.47 
3526.48 
1.02 
514.0 
0.0 
187.0 
0.199 
0 
0 
0.073 
0.360 

36 
3526.48 
3527.47 
0.98 
526.0 
0.0 
89.0 
0.205 
0 
0 
0.046 
0.481 
SS VFM 
37 
3527.47 
3528.16 
0.69 
1375.0 
0.0 
208.0 
0.216 
0 
0 
0.042 
0.548 
SS VFM PY CARB 
38 
3528.16 
3528.88 
0.72 
287.0 
0.0 
95.0 
0.207 
0 
0 
0.066 
0.462 














Arithmetic Averages 
0.78 
618.8 
0.0 
240.7 
0.253 
0.0 
0.0 
0.095 
0.443 














Core data listing for Shaly Sand Example
