INDUCTION LOG CONCEPTS Conventional induction logs measure conductivity perpendicular to the axis of the tool. In a vertical well, this is the horizontal direction. Vertical conductivity may be quite different. Recent developments have introduced a log that can measure vertically as well as horizontally. It is in the commercialization phase of development, and promises to be very useful in thin bedded and dipping reservoir rocks. The tool works in air, oil, or mid filled open holes but salt muds give poor results. It does not work in cased holes. Induction logs are designed to measure the conductivity of rock formations by using the electromagnetic principles outlined by Faraday, Ampere, Gauss, Coulomb and unified in a single theory by James Maxwell in 1864. The process involves the interaction of magnetic and electric fields:
1. alternating
current applied to transmitter coils The basic equations for a single transmitter – receiver coil pair, in EXTREMELY simplified form, are shown below.
1: Bt = uo * dI/dt
magnetic field due to current “I” in transmitter coil
Where; The magnetic fields, and currents in the rock and receivertransmitter system are vectors (amplitude and direction). The inphase component measured at the receiver coil is called the Real (or R) component. The signal that is 90 degrees out of phase is called the Imaginary (or X) component. Older tools could measure only the R component. Newer tools measure both R and X components. The X component is used to enhance bed resolution by use of proprietary algorithms. If you can handle advanced calculus and know what the “curl” operator does, refer to “Basic Theory of Induction Logging” by J. H. Moran and K. S. Kunz, SEG Oct 1959 for the real story on induction log theory. The illustration at right shows a simple two coil induction log and a single "ground loop" of current circulating in the rock around the tool. An infinite number of ground loops exist, but only those near the tool will generate a magnetic field strong enough to produce a voltage in the receiver coil. A real induction logging tool consists of several transmitterreceiver coil pairs within a logging tool housing. A 20,000 Hz regulated alternating current is produced in the transmitter coils, which induces eddy currents by electromagnetic induction into the rocks surrounding the coil system. The eddy currents generate a magnetic field, which in turn induces voltages in the receiver coils. By keeping the transmitter current constant, the magnitude of the eddy currents are proportional to the conductivity of the formation and 90 degrees out of phase with the transmitter current. Voltages at the receiver coil induced by these eddy currents are also proportional to the formation conductivity and approximately in phase with the transmitter current. The electronic circuitry of the receiver is designed to detect the inphase component of the receiver coil voltage and this serves as a measure of the conductivity of the formation. The eddy currents induced in a conductive formation experience phase shift and attenuation. The loss due to attenuation is known as skin effect (or propagation loss) and is corrected by proprietary service company algorithms.
RADIAL and VERTICAL GEOMETRIC FACTORS The radial geometric factor G considers the formation as the combination of a large number of cylinders coaxial with the borehole. The integrated radial geometric factor, Gr, is the sum of all the G values for the total volume within a cylinder of radius, r. This represents a thick homogeneous formation invaded by mud filtrate where conductivity changes radially, and includes a small portion of the borehole. The signal measured by an Induction log positioned opposite a thick formation usually reflects the conductivity of that formation; however, in thin formations, the signal is affected by the conductivities of the adjacent formations. In a similar manner, the integrated vertical geometric factor, Gv, becomes the sum of the G values for all of the volume above (or below) a horizontal plane at a distance, z, from the center of the coil span. The integrated vertical geometric factor increases with the vertical distance, z, and must equal unity for all space. Development of the geometric factor for a focused induction log can be accomplished by adding algebraically all combinations of transmitterreceiver coil geometric factors times each coil pair's contribution to the total instrument response. This is done by computer modeling at the time the tool is designed. To illustrate the geometric factor
concept, assume borehole size = 8 in, invasion diameter = 40
in, Cm = 1000 mmho/m, Ci = 50 mmho/m, Cu = 100 mmho/m. For
a particular induction log, assume:
1: CONDa
= Gm * Cm + Gi * Ci + Gu * Cu The borehole and invasion create a 2.2 mmho/m error (100 – 97.8) in the measured value of the uninvaded zone conductivity.
Bed thickness correction charts are provided by service companies for their particular tools, based on the vertical geometric factor concept. The following example illustrates the geometric factor for thin bed response for a typical logging tool:
Given:
Bed Thickness = 4 ft, CONDb = 100 mmho/m, CONDs = 1000 mmho/m,
Gb = 0.728, CONDa = 100 * 0.728 + 1000 * 0.272 = 345 mmho/m The apparent conductivity is 3.45 times the actual conductivity of the zone (100 mmho/m), a 345% error, illustrating the large error inherent in typical induction log readings in thin beds. A resistive formation needs to be at least 24 feet thick for the vertical geometric factor to approach 1.0.
BED BOUNDARIES ON INDUCTION LOGS
Unfortunately, most modern induction logs display resistivity on a logarithmic scale, not conductivity on a linear scale. As a result, the midpoint rule is impossible to apply directly. You could do two quick resistivity to conductivity conversions (COND = 1000 / RESD), find the midpoint, and convert it back to resistivity (RESD = 1000 / COND). This might be a bit onerous, so another rule is to pick the resistivity inflection points, then move the top boundary of resistive resistive beds up 2 to 4 feet, and move the bottom down by the same amount. Conductive beds get the same shift, but in the opposite direction  make the bed thinner. This helps to compensate for the curve shape distortion caused by transforming conductivity to resistivity. Newer induction logs have better focusing and this stretch may not be needed  compare to core or microlog or formation microscanner to see if a bed boundary shift is needed. This shift is NOT required on array induction logs. The illustration below shows the problem for a typical middle induction log.
INDUCTION LOG CURVE NAMES
InductionElectrical
Survey (IES)
Dual
Induction  LL8 or SFL (DIL or ISF)
Phasor Induction Log (DITE)
Array
Induction Log (AIT)
EXAMPLES OF INDUCTION LOGS
The newest array induction logs use multicoils combined with higher transmitter currents, plus very intensive inverse modeling to obtain conductivity focused to 1, 2, or 4 feet. Commercial software is available to perform similar inverse modeling on older logs, but the results will not be equal to a modern array induction because the software has much less data to work from. It is still worth doing, but don't expect miracles..


Page Views  Since 01 Jan 2015
Copyright 1978  2017 E. R. Crain, P.Eng. All Rights Reserved 