This page describes neutron logs profiles, in the order of their appearance over the years. This presentation style provides insights into tool evolution, and a specific tool’s capabilities and limitations. You will find most these tool types in your well files – here’s your chance to learn more about them.


The first commercial neutron logs were run in 1945 by Lane Wells. They are based on particle physics concepts. Neutron logs emit fast neutrons from a source at the bottom of the tool. The effect of interactions with the rocks and fluids on the neutron flux is measured by detectors above the source on the logging tool. Hydrogen has by far the largest impact, so the tool can be calibrated to represent hydrogen index, which is highly correlated with porosity. So neutron logs are considered to be porosity indicating tools.

There are three basic neutron logging instruments with a chemical neutron source. Each instrument is classified according to the energy level of the detected particles. Fast neutrons have energies greater than 100 KeV; epithermal neutrons have energies above 0.025 eV up to 100 KeV; thermal neutrons have an energy of approximately 0.025 eV (at 25 C).

The three tool types are generically called neutron - gamma, neutron - epithermal neutron, and neutron - neutron devices. The first is represented by the original neutron log that emitted fast neutrons and measured gamma rays of capture emitted by the nuclei of the rocks when a neutron was captured. They were called neutron-gamma or gamma ray neutron logs. The latter was widely used as a descriptive term but was confusing as it suggested that a gamma ray log was also being run with the neutron log. While both logs were often run together, the description of how the neutron log response was measured got lost in the process.

The second type emitted fast neutrons and measured the number of epithermal neutrons as they lost energy after colliding with atoms in the formation. These are represented by the sidewall neutron log (SNP) tools.

The third type uses detectors sensitive to thermal neutrons. These have dual detectors that allow for some borehole compensation, represented by compensated neutron logging tools (CNL).

A fourth type uses an accelerator source instead of a chemical source of neutrons. It measures both thermal and epithermal neutrons. The tools  are more delicate and more expensive but are safer and reduce paperwork if the tool is lost downhole.

GRN and CNL log types can be run in air, oil, or mud filled open or cased holes. SNP logs were not calibrated for use in cased holes.

 1. Radioactive Well Log Interpretation
      J.P. Campbell, A.B. Winter, Lane Wells, 1946

 2. Experimental Basis for Neutron Log Interpretation
     J.T. Dewan, L.A. Allard, Petroleum Engineer, 1953

 3. Sidewall Epithermal Neutron Porosity Log
J. Tittman, H. Sherman, W.A. Nagel, R.P. Alger, JPT, 1966

 4.  Dual Spacing Neutron Log - CNLi
R.P. Alger, S. Locke, W.A. Nagel, H. Sherman, AIME, 1971

In older tools run from 1945 into the mid 1960's, fast thermal neutrons are sent out, which are captured by hydrogen atoms. Gamma rays of capture are emitted to balance the energy. The number of gamma rays returning to the detector is inversely proportional to the number of hydrogen atoms, which is highly related to the porosity of the rock. These logs record the gamma ray count rates in counts per second. Conversion to hydrogen index or porosity was made by using a semi-logarithmic transform. This tool is obsolete.

The logging tool produced a single curve in counts per second or API neutron units. It was often run with a gamma ray log, so the GR curve in ug-Ra equivalent/ton or API gamma ray units would be presented in Track 1.

The emitted neutrons come from a radium – beryllium or an americium – beryllium source. Radium and americium are natural alpha particle emitters and the alphas eject fast neutrons from the beryllium. With its 433 years half life, the AmBe source output is considered very stable. Approximately 40 x 10^7 neutrons/sec at 4.5 MeV average energy are emitted by the source.

When the neutrons are sufficiently slowed down by collisions with the formation, they are captured by the nuclei and a high energy gamma ray of capture is emitted. The gamma ray count rate at the detector is inversely proportional to the hydrogen content of the formation, in a semi-logarithmic relationship. Borehole size and mud weight corrections and calibration to porosity was done by the log analyst. Detectors were Geiger-Mueller gamma ray counters.

The source to detector spacing on the older tools was 15.5 inches, giving good statistical accuracy. Longer 18.5” spacing tools became popular because they were more sensitive to porosity but suffered from higher statistical variations. These tools are obsolete and no longer available, but many thousands exist in well files waiting for the serious petrophysicist to use for finding bypassed oil and gas.

A large number of charts for specific tools, spacings, borehole conditions and rock types were available from service companies, such as the one shown below. These may no longer be easily found today, and the semi-logarithmic approach described below works well except in very low porosity .

GNT-F or G neutron porosity interpretation chart. Hundreds of such charts exist for dozens of tools for a large range of hole sizes, mud weights, and casing sizes. most are not contained in conventional chart books. Some are available on the Denver Well Log Society CD set

If no appropriate chart exists, or if you don't believe in them, it is expedient to use the "High porosity- Low porosity" method.

  1. Select a high porosity point on the log, usually a shale, and assign it a porosity based on offset wells with scaled logs or a local compaction curve. This is PHIHI.

  2. Pick the count rate on the neutron log at this point - this is CPSHI, even though it is a low numerical value.

  3. Choose a low porosity point on the log. Assign this a porosity value, again based on offset scaled porosity logs or core porosity. This is PHILO. Tight lime stringers or anhydrite are best but you need some imagination if there are no truly low porosity streaks.

  4. Pick the corresponding count rate on the log. This CPSLO, even though it is a larger number than CPSHI.

  5. Plot these points on semi-log graph paper as shown below. Read porosity for any other count rate from the graph.

Example of Porosity from Neutron Counts per Second - no shale correction

To use this plot in a calculator or computer instead of on a graph:
      1: SLOPE = (log (PHIHI / PHILO)) / (CPSHI - CPSLO)
      2: INTCPT = PHIHI / (10 ^ (CPSHI * SLOPE))
      3: PHIn = INTCPT * 10 ^ (SLOPE * NCPS)

A second type of logging system responds primarily to epithermal neutrons and is referred to as a neutron-epithermal (N-EN) log or a Sidewall Epithermal Neutron Log (SNP). The neutron detector counts the slow epithermal neutron density, which is largely determined by the amount of intervening hydrogen between the source and detector. The detector is a lithium iodide crystal with suitable shielding to eliminate thermal neutrons. This tool had a short lifespan from the mid 1960's to the early 1970's and was replaced by the CNL.

The source and detector are on a skid identical to the density logging tool. The skid is pressed against the borehole walls, eliminating most borehole and mudcake effects, except for very rugose hole conditions.

Detector count rates from the SNP systems are converted by a computer in the logging truck to porosity units, on a sandstone, limestone, or dolomite scale, depending on the assumed or known mineralogy of the formation. There is little borehole effect because the tool is a sidewall pad device similar to the density log skid. However, it sees a relatively small volume of rock, and has been generally superseded by the compensated neutron log (CNL).

The graph below shows the relationship between count rates at the detector of a sidewall neutron porosity (SNP) tool and porosity for the three primary lithologies. These results were obtained in the laboratory with quarried rock samples, and constitute the basic data for calibrating the tool in terms of porosity.

Response of SNP neutron log: Count rate vs slowing down length (left) and count rate vs porosity (right)

Also shown above is the same count rate data plotted against the calculated slowing down length Ls. A linear best fit is used to describe the correspondence between count rates and slowing down length. At low porosities, there is some lithological effect. Different rocks with the same count rate have different slowing down lengths. Also for some reason, the water point does not fit the line. Fortunately this is not serious as logs are seldom run in zones with more than 45% water.

If we know, or can calculate, the slowing down length for neutrons of epithermal energy, in particular rocks, such as calculated in the previous Section, we can enter this value in the graph above and obtain the apparent porosity reading for a real SNP type tool.

The usual log presentation is a single porosity curve, with GR in Track1, and possibly the epithermal neutron count rate.

The most commonly run neutron log today is the compensated neutron log. It is an eccentered dual detector log that can be run in both open and cased boreholes. This log measures the rate of decrease of neutron density with distance from a source and converts it to a calibrated apparent porosity value. The rate of decrease, represented by the ratio of the near to far count rates, is primarily due to the hydrogen content of the formation.

Most CNL tools are neutron – thermal neutron (N – N) tools but some have additional detectors for epithermal neutrons (N – EN) measurements.

Helium-3 detectors are used in the small diameter CNL instrument whereas the large diameter instrument utilizes lithium iodide crystals.

Variations from standard borehole conditions are compensated by means of the dual detector system. The corrected apparent porosity values are derived from the count rate ratio of near and far spaced detectors by a computer program. Additional environmental corrections may be required in hot, high salinity boreholes. The program also compensates for casing and cement thickness in cased hole situations.

The upper graph at right shows the relationship between near and far detector thermal neutron count rate ratio versus porosity for the three primary minerals, the data again being made in laboratory formations. The middle graph shows the same ratio data plotted against calculated migration length - Lm. The fit is excellent and even takes in the water point.

Again the migration length of an arbitrary mineral or mixture of minerals can be entered into the graph to obtain the apparent porosity reading for a real thermal neutron CNL type tool. Note that real tools may use function formers or computer algorithms to modify the apparent tool response. This is shown for the 1970'x vintage Schlumberger CNL tool in the bottom graph.

Considerable computer modeling of neutron response by service companies has generated numerous revisions of these response curves. Most of the effort has been directed at producing a linear porosity scale in all lithologies. Consult specific service company chartbooks for the era and tool designation.

Most petrophysical analysis programs use a generic lithology correction. Some perform corrections for a specific, but unknown, tool design that may be inappropriate for the the tool under investigation. Still others offer many tool options, but not all possible tools will be listed. The generic transforms are usually sufficient for typical petrophysical analysis, except in very hot, very salty mud systems, where accurate corrections may be needed.

The count rates from the two detectors can be displayed and are often used as gas detection indicators.

In clays, micas, and zeolites, the apparent CNL (thermal) porosity is consistently higher than the SNP (or CNL epithermal) porosity. As a result, the CNL thermal measurement shows higher porosities in shales than the SNP tool. The explanation for this effect is that the SNP tool responds only to the slowing down of the neutrons by hydrogen atoms, whereas the CNL measurement is also affected by the neutron capture process, since the tool measures both thermal and epithermal neutrons.

The log produces from 1 to 3 porosity curves based on different lithology assumptions and the two count rate curves. It is usually combined with the gamma ray, 1 or 2 caliper curves and either or both the density and density porosity.

A fourth style of neutron log uses a particle accelerator to create the fast neutrons, instead of a chemical source. The accelerator forces deuterium and tritium collisions at high energy levels to produce the neutrons. This tool is derived from the concept of the pulsed neutron (thermal decay time) tool widely used in cased hole logging to measure reservoir properties. It produces an epithermal neutron log.

The tool is called the accelerator porosity sonde (APS) by Schlumberger. When combined with a litho-density and spectral gamma ray logs, they call it an integrated porosity log (IPL).

Integrated porosity lithology service delivers accurate formation porosity and lithology information by acquiring neutron porosity, natural gamma ray spectrometry, density, and photoelectric effect measurements using one modular tool.

The accelerator porosity sonde, which uses an electronic pulsed neutron source instead of a chemical source, is the core of the tool.

The large yield of the neutron source enables epithermal neutron detection, which in combination with borehole shielding obtains porosity measurements that are only minimally affected by the borehole environment and formation characteristics, such as lithology and salinity.

Five detectors provide information for porosity evaluation, gas detection, and shale evaluation with improved vertical resolution and borehole correction.

The tool is usually combined with a litho-density photoelectric  logging tool and a natural  gamma ray spectrometry tool.

Log curves produced are similar to the CNL.


Gamma Ray Neutron (GRN)
Curves Units Abbreviations
neutron counts api or cps NCPS
* gamma ray API GR
* casing collar mv CCL
Sidewall Neutron Porosity Log (SNP)
Curves Units Abbreviations
neutron porosity % or frac NPHI or PHIN
* gamma ray api GR
caliper in or mm CAL
Compensated Dual-Spacing Neutron Log (CNL)
Curves Units Abbreviations
neutron porosity % or frac NPHI, NPOR, TNPH, or PHIN
* neutron count rate ratio frac NRAT
* neutron near count rate cps NCPS
* neutron far count rate cps FCPS
* casing collar mv CCL
* gamma ray API GR
Accelerator Porosity Sonde (APS)
Curves Units Abbreviations
neutron porosity % or frac APSC or PHIN
capture cross section cu SIGMA
* density, density porosity, PEF, sonic curves as requested
* gamma ray, gamma ray spectrolog as requested


Old style GRN neutron log recorded in counts per second (upper left), sidewall neutron SNP log
 (upper right) and modern compensated neutron CNL log (dashed curve) with density porosity
(solid curve). All have gamma ray in Track 1 with caliper for SNP and CNL-FDC displays.

Typical display format for PE-density porosity-neutron porosity log on a sandstone scale. The density correction curve may appear on the left or right side of the wide track. A density scale of 1.65 to 2.65 gm/cc may be used instead of the density porosity scale.

Page Views ---- Since 01 Jan 2015
Copyright 2023 by Accessible Petrophysics Ltd.
 CPH Logo, "CPH", "CPH Gold Member", "CPH Platinum Member", "Crain's Rules", "Meta/Log", "Computer-Ready-Math", "Petro/Fusion Scripts" are Trademarks of the Author